Offences
Rebellion
This is based on a public uprising with violence to achieve the overthrow, suspension or amendment of the Constitution, dispossessing the King of all his functions or prerogatives. One of the seven aims given as a possible purpose of this crime is to proclaim the independence of part of Spanish national territory.Demand for sentencesBetween 15 and 25 years’ imprisonment for instigators, between 10 and 15 years for those with secondary decision-making responsibility and between 5 and 10 for mere participants without decision-making responsibility. It can lead to 30 years imprisonment if arms or violence against people are used, or if public money is used for its purposes.Sedition
This penalises those who use force or illegal means to impede the application of the law through a disorderly public uprising. It also punishes those who prevent any authority complying with administrative or judicial decisions.Demand for sentencesIt establishes up to 15 years’ imprisonment as well as a ban on holding public office.Misuse of public funds
This crime is committed when those who have powers to administer the assets of others use them for purposes which are not public, adversely affecting the assets managed.Demand for sentencesBetween two and six years’ imprisonment and a 9- or 10-year ban on holding public office. However, if there has been serious damage or obstruction to public service, the prison term can be as long as eight years, plus a ban on holding public office.Disobedience
Failure to comply with an order issued by someone holding a position of authority over the recipient of such an order is always punishable, whether or not there is any tangible result.Demand for sentencesA fine and a ban on holding public office lasting between six months and two years. This is the crime for which Mas, Ortega, Rigau and Homs were convicted for the non-binding referendum of 9 November 2014.Criminal conspiracy
This is designed to fight criminality involving groups of people associating to commit serious illegality, for example terrorism or drug trafficking. The crime happens at the moment there is collaboration or participation, and it is not necessary for the illegal acts to be actually committed.Demand for sentencesBetween four and eight years’ imprisonment for the leaders and between two and five years for participants.
The arguments: Prosecution vs. Defence
Oriol Junqueras
Former Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for the Economy
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office consider him to be one of the principal promoters of the referendum in three basic areas: parliamentary, governmental and social action. It is believed that his department controlled the entire implementation and preparation of the referendum.
Defence
- He presents himself to the Supreme Court as the inspiration for “Junquerism”, a term used to refer to a peaceful, inclusive project rejecting all kinds of violent actions. He maintains that the referendum was no crime but was a single decision made unilaterally.
Jordi Turull
Former Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office hold the then Minister of the Prime Minister’s Office responsible for publicity campaigns advertising the referendum and for carrying out other tasks, despite the prohibition by the Constitutional Court. He is also said to have made various calls on social media to encourage participation.
Defence
- He maintains that he took no part in any episode of violent or riotous uprising. He believes the trial is “harassment of peaceful political leaders by those who do not share their ideas”. He says “there is no record of any episode – because there was none – in which I personally was involved in any violent or riotous uprising or incited citizens to do this; quite the contrary”.
Joaquim Forn
Former Minister of the Interior
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office agree in indicating that his role as Minister of the Interior was to ensure that the department controlling the Catalan police force would support the referendum on 1 October.
Defence
- He states that during his time as Minister of the Interior in the Catalan Government he did not give the Catalan police force any political orders. He says that on 1 October the policing arrangements were approved without objections by the prosecutors, Pérez de los Cobos and the High Court of Justice.
Josep Rull
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office consider that he tried to prevent a police ship mooring in Palamós harbour. He is also said to have publicised the referendum through social media and encouraged people to participate, despite the Constitutional Court ban.
Defence
- He says that no-one can speak of rebellion because their “only weapon was the ballot paper”. He states that the prosecutors’ story is the first one in history to speak of a rebellion in which there were leaders but no-one to implement it. He cannot understand how they can be accused of rebellion when the Spanish State never declared a state of siege.
Raül Romeva
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office consider him, as former Minister of Foreign Affairs, to be responsible for voting by Catalans abroad and for contracting international observers via DIPLOCAT for a referendum that had been declared illegal by the Constitutional Court.
Defence
- He reminds the Supreme Court of his track record of promoting a culture of peace and activism in non-violent projects. His department gave international publicity to a referendum which they saw as no crime.
Dolors Bassa
Former Minister of Employment, Social Affairs and the Family
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- As Minister of Employment, the charges consider that Dolors Bassa withdrew civil servants’ authority over polling stations, developed a volunteer base and encouraged civil servants to back the strike of 3 October.
Defence
- She maintains that she saw the referendum as “the exercise of a right; a formula for full participation by citizens in public life”. She states that the strike on 3 October was not challenged in the courts and that an order to ensure minimum services was issued.
Carme Forcadell
Former Speaker of the Parliament of Catalonia
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- In the eyes of Spanish State prosecutors and lawyers, the former Speaker of the Parliament is ultimately responsible for the Catalan legislature’s approval of the laws and resolutions for holding the referendum, despite the Constitutional Court’s warnings and prohibitions. Her calls for participation in the poll are also considered to be crucial.
Defence
- Forcadell says she played no part in any act to prepare for the referendum or in any violent action. She reminds the court that all she did was to make it possible to talk about the independence issue in a parliamentary session.
Jordi Sànchez
Former chairman of the Catalan National Assembly (ANC)
Accused of: Rebellion, sedition and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office say that, as ANC chairman, he was the key leader encouraging collective mobilisation in favour of independence from the Spanish State. They claim he mobilised Catalans to prevent the security forces completing the tasks required of them by the courts on both 20 September and 1 October.
Defence
- He points out that, both on 20 September and 1 October, he always firmly maintained that demonstrations had to be civic-minded and peaceful. He asks why he was never given a legal warning for disobeying the Spanish Constitutional Court for campaigning in favour of a Yes vote in the referendum.
Prosecution
- State prosecutors and lawyers attribute a similar role to the chairman of Òmnium as they do to Jordi Sànchez. But they also claim that, on 20 September, he appealed to the people mobilised at the Department of the Economy to maintain the determination shown in the Civil War, using the expression “They shall not pass!” and calling for permanent mobilisation.
Defence
- The Chairman of Òmnium wants to show that the demonstrations on 20 September and 1 October were entirely peaceful and that the only violence came from the police. He accuses the Spanish State of infringing a long list of fundamental rights with acts committed by the justice system, including torture.
Carles Mundó
Former Minister of Justice
Accused of: Misuse of public funds, disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- The Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office allege he was responsible for the Catalan government disobeying the Constitutional Court’s prohibitions on the calling of the referendum. Like the other accused ministers, he is accused of misuse of public funds.
Defence
- He begins with the fact that calling and holding a referendum is no crime, because it was decriminalised by Spanish Act 2/2005. He insists that a Spanish Treasury report has said that the departments of the Catalan government spent no public money, so there is no misuse of funds.
Meritxell Borràs
Former Minister of Governance
Accused of: Misuse of public funds, disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- She was investigated by the High Court of Justice for the contract to provide ballot boxes for the referendum. Now she is accused of disobeying the Constitutional Court and, like all members of the Puigdemont government, of misusing public funds.
Defence
- She states that no item involved in the referendum was charged to her department. She reminds the court that she was not an MP and that she therefore did not take part in any debate about the calling of the 1 October referendum. She maintains that she signed the decree before the Constitutional Court banned the referendum.
Santi Vila
Former Minister of Business and Knowledge
Accused of: Misuse of public funds and disobedienceProsecution
- Although he left the government hours before the Parliament’s Declaration of Independence, the Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office make no distinction for him. Like Mundó and Borràs, he is accused of disobeying the Constitutional Court and misusing public funds.
Defence
- He reminds the court that he was not an MP and did not take part in any decisions about the referendum. He signed the decree calling it, however, in the hope of reaching an agreed solution. He says his department did not spend a single euro on the 1 October referendum after it was banned by the Constitutional Court.
Lluís Corominas
Former Vice-Chair of the Bureau of the Parliament
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- As Vice-Chair of the Bureau of the Catalan Parliament, the Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office accuse him of having voted in favour of admitting proposals and resolutions intended to prepare the legal ground for calling the referendum. It also takes into account that, when he became chairman of the Junts pel Sí parliamentary group, he presented the Legal Transition Bill and the Declaration of Independence Bill.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Lluís Guinó
Former Vice-Chair of the Bureau of the Parliament
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- Guinó replaced Corominas as Vice-Chair of the Bureau of the Parliament and, like his predecessor, voted in favour of admitting the proposals to promote the referendum and the Declaration of Independence.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Anna Simó
Former Secretary of the Bureau of the Parliament
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- Simó was Secretary of the Bureau of the Parliament in the last term. In this capacity, the Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office accuse her of having voted in favour of the admission of all the proposals and resolutions attempting to prepare the legal ground for calling the referendum.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Joan Josep Nuet
Former Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of the Parliament
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- Nuet voted against the Disconnection Acts in the session on 6 and 7 September but, as a member of the Bureau, he allowed them to be admitted for discussion. For this reason, the Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Attorney General’s Office accuse him of disobeying the Constitutional Court.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Ramona Barrufet
Former Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of the Parliament
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- Barrufet voted in favour of admitting all the bills which, according to Spanish State prosecutors and lawyers, sought to prepare the legal ground for declaring independence, knowing that this contravened the decision of the Constitutional Court.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.
Mireia Boya
Former Chair of the CUP-CC parliamentary group
Accused of: Disobedience and criminal conspiracyProsecution
- Together with Lluís Corominas, Mireia Boya presented the Transitional Bill to the Bureau. On 27 September 2017, together with Corominas, Rovira and Gabriel, she presented the resolution so the session could approve the Declaration of Independence. These two facts are the basis of the accusation of disobedience from the Prosecutor’s Office and the Spanish Attorney General’s Office.
Defence
- Awaiting presentation of the defence case in writing to the High Court of Justice of Catalonia.